Im glad to see eHarmony reacting in their formal web log to articles entitled “Marriage-Maker Claims Are Tied in Knots ” from the Wall Street log. The WSJ article examines many of the marriage data released by adult dating sites like eHarmony also the strategy always assess these types of stats. We lesbians chatted slightly about that subject and, fourteen days ago if the original WSJ article had been printed (see Story).
The WSJ article don’t check out kindly regarding the statistics launched by internet dating sites, and also for the many component I concur with the writer. The public does need to know exactly how these stats tend to be created. Of all the internet dating sites pointed out in WSJ post, “eHarmony stands apart as on the list of more cautious types”. This is not exactly a glowing report for eHarmony therefore, they made a decision to upload a reply on the blog.
During the eHarmony article each goes into further information on how they calculated that their particular dating site ended up being accountable for 2per cent of marriages in the usa, through the 12-month period closing March 2007. A lot of details we already realized about from a previously circulated PDF file named “eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 wedding Metrics many eHarmony Marriages” (see tale), however the post does eliminate some more details. Exactly what this web site article really does show is actually, eHarmony is wanting are as available and clear using their research conclusions as possible. I believe title “start telecommunications” may certainly end up being your best option when it comes down to recognized eHarmony web log.
This is actually the complete eHarmony a reaction to the Wall Street Journal how they calculate their relationship data. For additional information about this dating website, read the report about eHarmony.